Passivhaus Precedents Zero Energy House From 1970S Recognized With Award

Isaac Newton wrote about his work, acknowledging those before him: “If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.” The idea of the Passivhaus, or Passive House building system, is often seen as an original mix of super-insulation, tight envelope and controlled ventilation, when in fact lot of people were looking at many of the key principles back in the seventies.

That’s why it is so encouraging to see the Passivhaus Institute is honoring those who came before with the Passive House Pioneer Award. According to Passivhaus founder Wolfgang Feist, the award acknowledges these predecessors. Feist says they " call to mind the important historical milestones and appropriately appreciate their significance."

This year’s winner is the Zero-Energy House, built in Copenhagen in the 1970s by Vagn Korsgaard (1921 – 2012) and Torben Esbensen. From the press release:

Passepedia/CC BY 2.0

This is actually the third Pioneer award; the other two were the Philips Experimental House in Aachen:

Rocky Mountain Institute via Passepedia/CC BY 2.0

In 2011, The Rocky Mountain Institute won the award and honored RMI head Amory Lovins.

Fram/Public Domain

Interestingly, when you go to the Passipedia and look at the historical review, they list precedents going back to ancient China and to Nansen’s Fram, which was not only super-insulated but had wind-generated electricity in 1883.

The Tyee/Promo image

However it doesn’t list the Saskatchewan Conservation House at all. This 1977 house had most of the hallmarks of a Passive House, including almost airtight construction and lots of insulation. Physicist William Shurcliff wrote about it in 1979 and is quoted by Martin Holladay:

Holladay continues:

Yet somehow it is not even acknowledged as a precedent in the Historical Review page.

Saskatchewan Conservation House Section/Promo image

The Saskatchewan Conservation House isn’t the prettiest thing we have shown on TreeHugger, but it is important in the history of the Passivhaus movement. Look at that section: thick insulation all round a boxy design with few jogs, air to air heat exchangers, heat recovery on hot water, careful solar orientation and shading. It’s almost indistinguishable from a Passivhaus section, shown below. Why is it being ignored?

I am not sure why it is not recognized as an important precedent, but I am going to get all my Passivhaus buddies to nominate it for next year’s Passive House Pioneer Award.